What was her strongest argument in your opinion?
Discussion
I wouldn’t say there was one. Some notes, in draft:
To the collectivist, no incremental win, advancement, or solution is enough. Only 'equality' is success—total and absolute.
So long as someone or some group lacks ‘equality’, the individual cannot rest. The individual cannot be content. The individual must not be at peace.
This is cancerous thinking, and should be rejected, outright.
Haha yea dude that is similar to my perspective. It is the type of thinking that only someone that is low agency and allergic to success could possibly embrace.