The old

"tell me who owns this random utxo" 🙄

it is disingenuous and irresponsible to dismiss privacy concerns in this fashion.

a rando on the internet that cant establish ownership isn't a win.

we are concerned about dragnet surveillance and Chainanalysis, which you admit are problems but I guess you just don't see the problem?

likewise dismissing fungibility concerns with "oh well someone will take that utxo."

simultaneously admitting to Bitcoins lack of fungibility and the commensurate problems

but also assuring your audience it isn't a problem.

I guess its not a problem if you're a rule abiding normie.

But the entire point of Bitcoin was to disintermediate the banks. You are not acknowledging the risks involved in *actually doing* that disintermediation.