So I have been thinking lately, and I'm pretty confident at this point that a relatively private overlay protocol can be done on top of Nostr for people in dangerous situations. It would not be cleanly interoperable with conventional users.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

But that could make the overlay traffic easily distinguishable from conventional users, which might impact that overlay user, right?

Overlay is probably not the best term, but something piggybacking on it. The overlay graph would stand out, but not the individual social graph nodes within the overlay.

Ok, that makes more sense. It's a tough problem.

Similar dynamic than Tor, you can see the topology of Tor, but not what is going on inside it.

duh

lmao

it's literally just signed jsom blobs in servers

Properly constructed privacy is no where near that simple dunce.

I was saying that it's obvious you can build *anything* on top of such simple primitive.

Thus, your original note is straight up retard tier.

Are there benefits to using Nostr for privacy at all, though? If it mimics Tor, why would it be better than Tor?

To clarify: I'm not saying it's impossible or that it shouldn't be tried but Nostr is all about censorship-resistance through interoperability imo. Diminish the interoperability and what's left?