Nostr Web Client

It's so funny I feel like we are saying the same thing at different times.

My point is that if I run code that I agree with my mempool doesn't propagate things I consider to be spam. I have no illusions that if a miner mines a valid block with transactions I dislike, I will still have to store that block in my UTXO set. But the choice of not propagating trash is what is up for debate here not the bounds of a valid transaction in the block.

jb55 8mo ago

I mean i have always been on the side of relaxing standardness (i miss puzzle transactions) but i think core is always going to side on removing knobs that produce foot guns, not adding more powerful customization. I think i plugin system would be cool so you could implement any logic you want, so noone would have to argue. I think the concern then would be social media campaigns for people to download certain plugins without realizing the effects it would have on tx distribution.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

JackTheMimic 8mo ago

Man, if social media campains to influence people are the problem, I heard about this neat protocol...do you like purple?

ShiShi21m 7mo ago

How is removing the OP Return limit reducing happen stance of foot guns?

jb55 7mo ago

https://gist.github.com/instagibbs/c436110890ab25aa9997b13c2270d5ce#:~:text=When%20the%20polite%20avenue%20is%20blocked%2C%20determined%20users%20turn%20to%20impolite%20ones.Some%20use%20bare%20multisig%20or%20craft%20fake%20output%20public%20keys%20that%20do%20enter%20theUTXO%20set%2C%20exactly%20the%20outcome%20OP_RETURN%20was%20invented%20to%20avoid.

jb55 7mo ago

> When the polite avenue is blocked, determined users turn to impolite ones. Some use bare multisig or craft fake output public keys that do enter the UTXO set, exactly the outcome OP_RETURN was invented to avoid.

I’m kinda tired of talking about this tbh. The linked document has everything you need to know