I like at times to think i'm not too dumb but if i'm reading this graph right, it tells me that while Zap events are growing, the Zap providers, senders and receivers are almost always the same Nostriches? 🤔
Cc: #[0]
[779554]
Discussion
Makes sense.
The zap providers are software developers which makes since there would be low variation.
The senders are receivers appear to be slowly growing while increasing use.
Thanks for clarifying Zap providers here 🤙🏻
[779554]
Would be also interesting to see the total zap sums. Because maybe the total sum is the same, but it happens in smaller chunks.
Also could be interesting to see if there is any circular behaviour, so the same amount of sats are sent around, or "new sats" are getting into the system.
Fully agree, it would tell a better story and a better follow up on net growth
[779554]
Which site have you used for the plot?
Providers may not be growing (hard to tell on the scale) but senders and receivers are growing, so I would say they are not always the same.
Personally, I zap mostly those I follow, and I assume others are doing the same. Occasionally I will scroll through global for random zappees.
Zap to me ⚡⚡⚡⚡
I would think ixponential zapping as slight increases of people come on board is great. Shows that while there is slightly more people, there's a great deal more activity. No?
Good observations, perhaps it’s game theory at play and the circular economy working to redistribute wealth ☝️