nostr:npub1m3xdppkd0njmrqe2ma8a6ys39zvgp5k8u22mev8xsnqp4nh80srqhqa5sf pointed out, that if we merely link events in, the original event could be deleted or seriously altered, and that would change the content of the 30040, and possibly alter the statement that the index is trying to make. nostr:npub1wqfzz2p880wq0tumuae9lfwyhs8uz35xd0kr34zrvrwyh3kvrzuskcqsyn had the idea that we could clone the content of the event and create a 30041 out of it, with all of the appropriate tags filled out, but including a link back to the original event. Then we'd have to somehow denote when the original and our clone differ and offer to re-clone the event or reject the changes.