Custodial "Layer 2" federatoooors are the new shitcoiners

Just as shitcoiners rode Bitcoin's coat-tails for personal gain, Federatoooors are running the same playbook with Lightning

Lightning is the intransigent minority, scales sufficiently, and is not going anywhere

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think we will see a range of things and there will be nuance. Some federated layer 2 systems will make better, more distributed, more secure networks that support openess and each other. Others will likely offer a fractionally backed token and be more of decentralization theatre. And all in-between. Caveat emptor.

Federations aren't layer 2 anymore than an SQL database is

It's all theatre, that's the point

Lightning is the minority. Because it doesn't scale.

FTFY.

As reusable Bitcoin transactions it scales infinitely

The UTXO set might not, but that's a feature of 21M, not a deficiency of Lightning

Soooo... its going to remain the minority because it doesn't scale number of users. Ack.

What arbitrary number of users do you have in mind?

If 21M isn't enough for you then "scaling" is shitcoining

I would like bitcoin to be used by the whole world. So lets try 8billion. So no, 21million users is not enough and would still be a minority.

You seem very middle curve in your takes, sir. Have an above average day.

Oooooo. I recall now. You're the guy that thinks ecash is a government psyop.

😂😂

Carry on, good sir.

It's banker tech, not Bitcoin

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1011x1920&blurhash=%5D8Q%5D%2Bx9Fa%7D-%3BIU9Fs.NGt7WB9utlM%7Bnixu_Nx%5DV%5BV%40IUxtRjoyfkWBMdIAtQtRxu%24yMx%25Mt8WCx%5DSi%25MM_t7%3FbtRt7IUt7&x=d05258d15058d6d5e996901fe65b3f7d44e17d5d783b8759770d12621a413546

OMG! THE NAME OF A CONGRESSIONAL BILL USED ECASH, CLEARLY THIS MEANS THAT ANYTHING CALLED ECASH IS A GOVT PSYOP.

this is a bad take. you can't be serious.

Whatever helps you sleep at night while you attack Bitcoin

You want 8b to use shitcoin*

Do you mean stuff like stacks, or are you talking about ecash

ECash

I don't think stacks tries to hide the fact it's a scamcoin

Can you justify this position?

Yes, shitcoiners are attempting to trojan their scams into Bitcoin projects and pretend it's scaling.

2014 all over again.

Can you explain how ecash is a scam?

More like ECashers are scammers.

ECash *could* have legitimate internal uses, like access tokens.

Instead, NGOs and their useful idiot Federatooors, who are taking handouts in exchange for pushing it as a Bitcoin payment layer- are scammers.

Which specific NGOs and people are you calling out?

The money is fairly easy to follow, dyor

You made a pretty wild claim, I asked you to clarify, and you wouldn't specify. Thanks for the help

Shitcoinery grants left and right are hard to miss

If you can't observe what's out in the open yourself then I can't help you

i'm waiting to see where ark goes

source routing makes lightning brittle

side chains are not in the same category as lightning, which uses game theory and commitments to maintain low trust requirement - it's only one risk at a time per channel you run, not risking a whole stack on one network that you aren't a validator on

Sidechains aren't in the same category because they're not Bitcoin

Lightning is Bitcoin