ridiculous
when there's consensus,
in what sense is it "hostile"?
Discussion
There will always be a small minority who dont agree with forks. And it's not really true consensus because 99.9999% of users dont have the knowledge to understand whats being changed in the code, you have to trust a few handful of devs. Bitcoin has this problem aswell. Every fork is hostile.
communities have to make decisions somehow penguin
you can call it "hostile" because some rando running a node somewhere disagrees or isn't interested in change.
your perspective there just results in "nothing ever happens because somebody somewhere doesn't understand or doesn't agree"
it results in inaction 100% of the time with a community of more than 50 people.
there are no "win-win" utopian solutions where everybody agrees and nobody gets hurt.
welcome to the real world.
we move forward.