I’m sure I’ll have more to add when I get deeper into the video but half an hour in… So according to Rudolf Steiner, the sarcophagi in Egypt were intended for spiritual practical purpose, but it was deep than just sensory deprivation for theta waves. They would have a ritual that mimicked Christs death and resurrection where they would be in a near death state for 3 days. It was part of an initiation process for that time. Also per his lectures the removal (still there for those who know how to read it) of reincarnation from the Bible was not decided by Rome. They certainly could have been a helpful instrument. It was not to be in the Bible because of the problem with it in the East. People were not living in the present life deep enough to learn and grow as they were intended. So for a time that knowledge was hidden so we could develop correctly. Essentially each major religion is created for a specific time and people. (Christianity is obviously different in that it’s not tied to a people the same way) Also I’d like to encourage you if you are not already doing so to develop the necessary conditions in your bodies to perceive these things for yourself.
Discussion
Steiner is one of the more accurate sources. A lot of what he said is valid.
The sarcophagi were sensory deprivation tanks. That’s the reason they were used in the initiation and healing work.
The mimicry of Christ’s death and resurrection is slightly distorted by modern understandings of words. When you get deeper into the show, you will get to the etymological root of the word “death”: da’ath. Da’ath is Gnosis aka Vishuddha, the “wisdom chakra” in the throat.
Religious themes of death and rebirth for normies revolve around this cosmic truth. When a person is truly “born again”, ie has experienced a metanoia, a dark night of the soul, etc. that “Phoenix” rises from its own ashes. Solve et coagula is the same meaning…dissolve and reform anew. Dissolve is the root of salvation.
The penultimate Tarot archetype of the 7 Tarot spirit archetypes is “The Great AWAKENING”. Amongst other symbols on that card includes sarcophagi.
Itzhak Bentov’s work showed that theta waves in 4 or 7 Hz can induce spontaneous kundalini AWAKENINGS.
The sarcophagi had 3 purposes.
First the initiate had to heal. This form of healing involves past life memories. It seems to me to have been a Dolores Cannon style therapy but with a twist.
Second was initiation aka activation of higher chakras.
This is where the “death and resurrection” concepts come into play, slightly distorting things. The sarcophagus initiation ritual was a sensory deprivation tank experience intended to induce theta waves in the initiate which would induce activation of higher chakras.
Activating the wisdom chakra is “da’ath” in the Egyptian/Hebrew tradition of Kabbalah. To declare that the sarcophagus ritual was meant to mimic Christ’s death and resurrection is extremely anachronistic and false.
Christ came long after the pyramids were built and sarcophagi were used in these ways. Also, Christ’s “da’ath” occurred LONG BEFORE the crucifixion. So, bluntly, Steiner is not entirely correct in his articulation of how sarcophagi were used. He is fairly close though and, again, I give him due credit for being one of the most accurate sources we have.
The Law of One really drives this argument to an end. 2.4 points out that the pyramids were for initiation and healing. 3.16 points out that the first use of pyramids is sensory deprivation of initiates.
57.24 makes it clear that initiation means activation of all “energy centers” which are acknowledged as being the same as “chakras” in this source material. 80.20 offers insights into Tarot archetype 20 which is about da’ath. Card 21 is about 3rd eye activation.
Christs death is a lot more complicated than that in Steiner’s work. Essentially he is the being who ruled the sun and was referred to in all those religions with a deity of the sun iE Ra. His death was part of his merging with the earth and becoming Lord of the Earth. Christ is not Jesus, but Jesus was the lower bodies He incarnated into. So yes Jesus had his awakening/initiation in previous incarnations (Hermes/Zoroaster/exc), but what Christ did was a much bigger and unique event with multiple occurrences before and to come in other planes than the physical.
Law of One >>>>> Steiner
Steiner teaches how to develop the ability to perceive Ra directly for yourself. I’ll look into the law of one, but I’m definitely going to be cautious. I had a feeling of truth from Steiner before ever understanding what he was talking about. Maybe there’s some connection there. (His birthday is only 3 days after mine)
The key is perspective of the observer.
Steiner is like us: subjected to the limitations of the “third density” experience.
The source of information in the Law of One is not encumbered by third density limited perspective.
I think of this using Buddha as an example. While growing up, Buddha lived inside of a walled garden…a false paradise created by his father to shelter Buddha from the horrors of the real world.
Let Buddha represent Steiner. Let the source from the Law of One be Buddha’s father.
Steiner, like Buddha, has a perspective from within the walled garden.
The source of the Law of One material, like Buddha’s father, has the greater perspective because its perspective is not under the restrictions of the walled garden aka the limitations of third density existence.
Again, I think Steiner is important and has a lot of good information to offer. I don’t see his work as being anywhere near 100% accurate but I see it as being a wealth of information to draw from.
I’m not done looking into it, but I searched The Law of One and found it. After reading the portion directly on the Law of One (and a little of the ufo section) I definitely had some red flags come up. Maybe it will clear up and seem only easily misunderstood by most people, but the parts about there being no wrong or no way not to serve the creator seem very troublesome. It reads like the ego inflating Luciferic cult stuff. It, to me, is either trying to teach cosmological concepts beyond what the questioner was asking and beyond what 99.999% are capable of thinking or it’s a distortion of those concepts. It also doesn’t make logical sense (at least at this level) for that teaching to be true unless there is literally no reason to do this instead of that beyond mere self expression. I don’t see how it can be consistent with any moral philosophy or any imperative to do or not do.
Like I said I’m not done looking into it. I certainly don’t think it’s devoid of true knowledge unknown to much of mankind. I will update you with further concerns, but the two “nefarious” groups it made come to mind are the “Luciferic” beings as described in anthroposophy and the Lords of Belial as Edgar Casey would describe. (Essentially transhumanists who led to the fall of Atlantis.
Yeah…there’s a lot of “Momma Boucher” conditioning out there.
Nowhere in the Bible does it say that the serpent is Lucifer. That’s dogma. It’s in commentary but not in the direct translation.
The serpent found everywhere is symbolic of the Kundalini serpent which is why it is revered prominently in many religions and at many ancient archaeological sites.
Likewise, the image of Baphomet, commonly associated with Luciferic or Satanic entities, has many hallmarks of a fully enlightened being…an ascended master. You’ve got the horns of the Alpha, the bull, the Divine Masculine. You’ve got the breasts, symbolizing femininity and with the Divine Masculine horns, are symbolizing Alpha and Omega, Yin and Yang, Shiva and Shakti, Ka and Ba.
The caduceus symbol is visible in that same depiction. The caduceus is another kundalini/enlightenment symbol.
Also, the hands are pointing above and below. That one’s too easy.
Then there’s solve & coagula on the arms. Solve is “disSolve” like da’ath/rebirth, metanoia, born again, Phoenix rising from its own ashes, the dark night of the soul…the solute (Div Masc) penetrates the solvent (Div Fem) who receives it. This creates a solution or Divine Child aka a Son or Daughter of God. Gender here is irrelevant because all Ascended Masters are spiritually hermaphroditic which is where that term came from: Hermes(Mercury, representing the Div Masc) and Aphrodite(Venus, representing the Div Fem).
If we take the idea that the totality of Creation, including ourselves, all matter, all light, all consciousness, IS the One Infinite Creator, then that means that everything and everyone IS some chunk of God playing out the ongoing process of Creation.
That means even the most evil, self serving, Anthony Fauci, Genghis Khan, etc types of people you can think of are also part of the One Infinite Creator. There is no exception. All is one.
Bear in mind why we even exist in the first place. Omniscience is boring. There’s no novelty. There’s no discovery. But LIMITED existence…now THERE’S an interesting game to play.
So God diasporated into a gajillion units and the universe formed. Matter evolves in the physical universe. Higher consciousnesses arise, ascend, and go on to “lighter” realms. Some might say heaven or hell. Others might describe them as another dimension. The Law of One would describe them as 4th density positive (heaven) and 4th density negative(hell).
You go where you polarize. If you polarize towards being of service to others, you go with all the others who are like you to 4th density positive.
If you polarize towards service to the self, you go with all the other self serving, lying, manipulating, deceiving, backstabbing, selfish people who were the cream of the crop at executing that agenda. Sounds like a pretty hellacious place to go. Not for me.
But, the One Infinite Creator is interested in Creation or else none of this would be here. Creation is predicated by will. That means the One Infinite Creator is, like us humans, gonna look at the wrecked cars and the ambulance on the side of the highway and the person being carted off on the stretcher. The One Infinite Creator is interested in watching TV channels like the Discovery Channel and History Channel, but also is going to laugh at the devious shenanigans of the gang on It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia or Shameless.
As above, so below. The Creator is interested in novelty, discovery, creation. You gotta admit…from the heavenly 4th density positive, watching the 4th density negative people duke it out, vying with one another, backstabbing, lying, manipulating, warring, etc. would make for some great entertainment. You wouldn’t want to live IN certain sitcoms, but you’ll watch em and laugh.
I imagine it is something similar. Also, if you’re going to love unconditionally, you’ll have to find a reason to love everyone, including that which you consider to be the complete opposite of what you aspire to embody. In the instances in which you, a positively polarized person, would encounter a negatively polarized person, perhaps the simplest way to exercise unconditional love for that negative person is to love them for demonstrating a way of being that you choose not to be. In other words, love them for setting an example for you to consider emulating. This is a service they’ve done for you, if absolutely nothing else. There is love in every moment. We just have to find it.
I get that. The Luciferian concept I’m referring to is part of a duality where Lucifer is a spiritualistic force and Arihman is the materialistic force. They are both an extreme embodiment of those forces and Christ is the balance in the middle. They are also polarized on unity/self expression and some other things. Neither is “bad” itself and both bring expressions of new aspects of creation.