nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s did I see this correctly? Is you zapped a reposted note the zap goes to the original poster? #damus
Discussion
yes to me that makes the most sense
What about a 80/20 split? Curation is worth something.
Incentivizing repost bots is my concern 🤔
Also a thing. This is more complicated than you would think. Looks like you have been thinking about this a bit longer 😅
Tim Apple poured cold water over experimentation on iOS by calling zaps “purchasing digital content”.
Damus Android should allow for experimentation on this frontier.
#MNGA
Bots usually don't get zaps as zaps are a very conscious action, but also: if the bot is useful in terms of curation and surfacing interesting content, wouldn't the bot (its author) deserve it?
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1440x877&blurhash=i76*2a%7EA-Ar%3FRiE0EKEh9%5BI.IpIVR%25oyxHxGxYxaTGXUEKNaj%5Enjr%3FwzwK%3D%7D%250sCniaxR*R*NuNa-WsQsCn%24axRjR%2BS%23S%23&x=1027cb562cd289d8c0593cca03c3e397d46038a7b04a08223867ea820e29ad4e
Is this configured by the user or the reposter? Aren’t zaps splits defined on the note ?
That's the Amethyst zap splits, and yes, they're on the note. But you could make the repost-zap-splits configurable in the client, so I'd be zapper-preference.
Reposts probably shouldn't be shown unless you follow the npub reposting. ie. Not in global
Then repost bots wouldn't be a concern
I only see them when I review 1984 reports
imposter accounts use reposts from the accounts they are impersonating
True! And what is you could set this yourself in the client? Democratize the shit out of it 😉
Up to the poster
Love it.😍 #nostr keeps on surprising me.