"The progress from an absolute to a limited monarchy, from a limited monarchy to a democracy, is a progress toward a true respect for the individual. " Rather self contradictory document; Monarch is intended to protect the individual and provide a suitably liable party, as in suitably knowing and with enough *vomit* Gold that a penalty could actually be imposed upon them for not protecting the rights of the citizen.

Outsourcing the work and liability of governance to the public who cannot afford the cost of its own actions (vote) protected the British Crown from (and others) from the intended system of liability for the acts of citizens onto other citizens. Given the the US and Australia both started as prison colonies it is ironic to see a system of law developed by criminals for criminals enforced by criminals and resisted by those too dumb to opt out.

The US claims it is legally established as a vassal state of the Swiss republic; while the Swiss can likely afford the costs of their own actions and until recently seemed able to hold a vote / democracy there is no doubt that they cannot afford to pay for the illegal actions of either of our former employers.

It's not within the origin of intents that citizens have to revolt against the systems of governance to ovoid liability; yet it is the reality of the world as is if your not fighting against the crimes of such criminal governance than you are in fact the very implement that is expected to pay in forced labor. All of this sounded well and good to industrialists but in an age of modern automated manufacturing factories don't even turn the lights on; let alone employee human labor.