For sure SimpleX seems to be the best choice for hiding the social graph
Correct me if I'm wrong though, but doesn't "Sealed Sender" + hashed contacts hide who messages come from to Signal? And isn't encryption done client-side?
Discussion
Who the fuck needs to protect their social graph? Some noob ass privacy faggot tranny!
SimpleX is okay, but how is assigning an ID to a connection more private than assigning to a user in practice? You're gonna share the connection ID through compromised channels.
SimpleX groups are O(n). Meaning if it takes a second for a group of 10. It's 100s for a group of 1,000.
User IDs don't matter if you're talking to people you don't know IRL.
The same way it's none of anyones business what me and someone else are talking about, it is none of their business who I'm talking to. That's why I would prefer to hide the social graph.
About assigning ID vs ID to a connection...you can use one-time connection IDs similar to stealth addresses on Monero iirc
I get your point about the risk of talking to people you don't know IRL and compromised channels. But they still wouldn't be able to know who else you are talking to, or you want to use it to talk to people you know IRL, it still matters.
You pretty clearly haven't read this.
Maybe hit the books a little more there tiger.
https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplexmq/blob/stable/protocol/overview-tjr.md
It's amazing. This is similar logic Bitcoin Maxi's use to discredit Xmr...
and teenage boys about the pull out method.