I don’t want to be dragged into any of Roger Ver’s BS, why are you so involved and going around calling me dishonest and a liar? I literally just screenshotted what someone said and said it was silly, and it is.
Discussion
Fair. The person on the screenshot bears more of the responsibility
Bears zero responsibility. At the time of the post the IRS was *already* investigating Roger very seriously. nostr:nevent1qqsf6m02quv6ehwqlf5xe5rmqatsl2tkczmmxa4x4nra9mjdrhddrpgpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucm4wfex2mn59en8j6gpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3gamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xwqguwaehxw309ahx7um5wghx6at5d9h8jampd3kx2apwvdhk6ztue8s
If this is true, I would say you have a good point. Though gmax making threat means that it's possible he had it in mind earlier.
Do you have any evidence for this irs investigation and when it started?
Transferable? No, of course not, they don’t post these things publicly lol, they even tell you not to tell people. But when the case goes to trial the timeline should be in the docs, you’re welcome to read them for yourself.
My question would be uf anyone but an insider lile yourself could have known. Because if not, I don't think there's anything wrong with speculating about the possibility of gmax threat not being empty