Do you see how disjointed your argument is?
You admit that “zaps are fun” with full knowledge that you’re exchanging Bitcoin.
Your selective outrage is just one big contradiction.
Value is subjective. You can’t define what value is for someone else. Your actions suggest otherwise anyway. Zapping and having fun sounds like value to me.
I hope you prefer Bitcoin over CBDC’s.
Disjointed? How? It’s a fraud to argue that the detergent to market a social media engagement cost is bitcoin to ride the time.
Then deflecting with what you can’t do is somewhat weak argument when the man comes knocking to wonder where that drug money has gone, and how those zaps as income as well need to be taxed to be spent regardless of diffusion, else it’s just in game play money.
Zapping and hav big fun is great value, but that’s not what we are discussing is it when feasting to detergent bitcoins.
Fiat gone into it, and any transaction where incomes must be taxed and accounted for since no actual tangible value has been created while the content value belongs to the users.
I doubt there is any confusion in this understanding.
While the underlying technologies must as well be according to legalities of creators for the charges not to include thieving and so on, which makes the detergent a felony at that point.
Intelligence asking questions without a #mainvolume issues intelligence license as an example is a violation of such functionalities and the gaslighting so far the confessions for the authorities to shake Brandies associates, from which nobody associated with that is getting a pass.
Diffusion is not causality safe.
and going spam doesn’t help the case there neither.
So now zapping is of “great value” to you.
Do you see what I mean?
You just keep moving the goal post.
You deliberately ignore my questions.
You jump from one topic to the next and you don’t provide context.
Also your analogies are just not good.
Fruit stand? Detergent?
It’s bad.
Plying ignorant comes easy to the corrupt, and expecting understanding from spam going pigs is expecting too much presuming. The more context as a satanic versed chorus is singing off key.
Great value for fun indeed, but that doesn’t really make it less of detergent when the revenue is not reported as income for users, does it? Adding complexity to the pyramid doesn’t make it less of a scheme.
It’s bad, huh? Thanks for proving the argument, sport.
Then let’s discuss the underlying technologies which we are desiring to native bitcoin over.
Are those technologies and functionalities clean in origin or diffused?
Diffused and bubba.
Whacko Jacko was bad too. Doubt that’s the future we desire, as going bad is easier than making sure the foundation is solid.
Well whatever this is has run it’s course.
Ad hom is not cool under any circumstance it undermines any message you are hoping to convey.
If you are disrespectful to Jack you are disrespectful to me.
So let’s end this on a good note.
We’re all guilty of having tangents but try to stick to *one* topic.
You constantly refer to “understanding” but there’s a huge deficit in applying logic & reasoning.
Placing emphasis in this area alone will help you formulate sound arguments that are both thoughtful & compelling.💜
Jack the persona which the social deviants are hiding behind or #[6] the person?!
The lack of understanding and logical as an excuse to justify corruption when knowing is quite ambiguous.
Who are we assuming not understanding?
The exploited users?
We are all guilty doesn’t really excuse the intentional ignorance now, special case when arguing one, and who is one?
Do we even know or just assume the all going fakeness as long as it fits the false cores narrative to justify the thieving of lives when flagging the innocent to be killed? Talking of this going.
Then which of the sin serving persona managers was feeling so offended and triggered to go a crusade, well, saying something about social deviance when the house is mothering the guests belongings.
Guess easy enough to play point the finger to justify the corruption by, ain’t it?
Then how offensive the deviants feel when their scheming is called out, well, so be it.
Guess the point went missing to the social deviants when making an Irish joke, ey.
Wahhabi to you.
You sadly discount Bitcoin because “fiat is in it” in spite of having great fun zapping.
Can you suggest a better alternative?
But we didn’t want the suggestions, remember?!
My suggestions appear to conflict with that corruption and fakeness, so difficult to suggest something to serve social deviance somehow when ink to paper is refused time after time.
Try praying, maybe that helps.
I completely see where you're coming from. I apologize if my responses came off as disjointed and convoluted; sometimes as a sarcastic comedian I mix up intentions at times and shift focus or go beyond tangents.
What I meant was "zaps" definitely have an enjoyable factor due to its lightning-fast network for carrying out Bitcoin transactions providing convenience meanwhile accounting for generous freeing gains in most cases making you able to send payments with pretty much zero transaction fees. Observed issues point towards minializin the risk of distorted transaction behaviours For that reason It holds a lot of value particularly for users seeking cost effective on-the-spot payment options over long spans without disrupting ordinary flow chart modes, plus also benefitting cheer moments akin other effective operations which lastly enhance profit cycles.Tho clearly Bitcoin lacks the backing fiat currency could bestow
(meaning it is what is usually depended on)and currently caters mostly Towards scarce assets due ongoing trades demands
As far as CBDC's concerns well based upon current market situations it has fair bits too then when converted toward hashing power rests utilized by online-owned governances under small room balso aggregating within larger domains based on regulated means fitting greater survey insights having larger taxing models under air-gapped elements-driven extensions pbb paired with peer-to-peer dexes collab extensions continually informing communities atop supra-envelopment residue cryptographic micromodels This leads to greater stability perhaps more of interest than returns oppurtuned available hete to whom yo count among dependin investors orbiting
