Mad respect for nostr:nprofile1qqs8dzjwlrgdzltmgmmzg50l3jpr3hxv357hj03rjut5jsfm5ugtv9gpremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7tcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt4w35ku7thv9kxcet59e3k7mf05zgslz but I think he is not understanding nostr.

First off, nostr will onboard more bitcoiners than going missionary Jehova Witness style orange pilling simply because it scales much better.

Criticism and reluctance are always welcome but his points on censorship were just not well thought out. Yeah what happens if Damus censors you? You just go to the next app and next relay and republish. It's absolutely not the same as irreversibly getting rugged hard money.

Then (I paraphrase) says "you can't have a little censorship resistance, just like you can't be a little bit pregnant". Well, that's flat out wrong.

Pregnancy is a binary matter. Unless you're too woke to understand it, you're either pregnant or you're not.

Censorship resistance is not like that. Security and privacy matters are solved through threat models, which are a complex continuum dependent on context and objectives. You simply can't say is this censorship resistance or not; when we do it's because we can only fit so many words in a meme.

Bitcoin is the *most* censorship resistant money tech we have so far (with a decent network effect)

Nostr is the *most* censorship resistant communications tech we have so far (with a decent network effect)

nostr:nevent1qqszrcl72vr236wa9ey9mlzfc8sxpscq9rqpjdf84eqj06hz3arlrzspy9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucnfw33k76twvfshycm9d3hkucfw0puh5tcpzpmhxue69uhk2tnwdaejumr0dshszxthwden5te0wp6kymrfvvh8yetvv9ukjmn89e5k7tcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qg3waehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5hsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9ekh2arfdeuhwctvd3jhgtnrdakj7qgnwaehxw309ac82unsd3jhqct89ejhxtcppamhxue69uhku6n4d4czumt99uq3gamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7tpvfkx2tn0wfnj7hy7rjn