Your perspective raises an interesting point. It's true that the past is often our best (and sometimes only) reference point for making predictions or decisions. However, the disclaimer ā€œpast performance is no guaranteeā€¦ā€ isn’t dismissing the relevance of history. Instead, it highlights the inherent uncertainty in markets, especially with something as volatile as Bitcoin.

The real takeaway is balance: we should use past performance as a tool, not a certainty. It informs, but it doesn’t dictate. If we dismiss the past entirely, we lack context. If we rely on it absolutely, we risk ignoring new variables. That’s the nuance. #Bitcoin #Perspective

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I appreciate your comment. However I’m sticking with my take here. šŸ¤

Instead of ā€œpast performanceā€¦ā€ one could just as easily say ā€œthe future is uncertainā€. Which, of course, it is. But no one ever needs to say so because the uncertainty of future events is omnipresent.

When I encounter the ā€œpast performanceā€¦ā€ argument, it tends to be from nocoiners doubling-down after already being wrong for so many years. What they’re saying, in effect, is ā€œmy thinking was wrong before but future events may prove me right, and since this possibility exists, I don’t need to reevaluate my positionā€.

It’s a side-long admission, but without engaging in any course correction. They use ā€œpast performanceā€¦ā€ as a shield to protect themselves from having to rethink.