A lot of market participants expect capitulation from Trump, but imo the more likely outcome is little/no capitulation, at least for a while, but instead attempts at shifting the blame of the costs and some mild verbal capitulations to calm market a bit. Like it's the Fed's fault for not cutting rates, and things like that.

Rebalancing decades of imbalanced trade policy does not happen without pain. The issue is that the administration marketed it as being relatively painless, as any politicians would. And many voters bought into it. So it's not to an easy problem, and it's a noble goal, but there was a mismatch between what was promised and what is possible, as is often the case.

Some interesting semi-capitulation points to watch: will Bessent maintain the high rate of Tbill issuance for liquidity that he criticized Yellen for? Will Trump shake out his inner circle and use several of them as scapegoats?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

On my political wishlist is for congressmen and the courts to recognize the tariffs as illegal on the grounds that many (if not most) of them have nothing to do with national security interests, which is what currently gives him the legal argument that he can do this. Congress originally held the power to impose tariffs (last major tariff regime was set by a law, the Smoot-Hawley Act).

Even cynical politicians should be able to see it as politically advantageous once the pain really starts to set in, which is why I think there’s a chance of this.

And that nobody’s selling BTC that hasn’t been forced to tells us where we’re going regardless

Yes, there will be many potholes along the way:

- expected EU retaliatory measures, and others

- 2Q pre-announcements and downgrades, followed by artificially deflated earnings and down forecasts

- potential exogenous events (e.g. blow ups, EM instability)

- Apr macro data trickling in May

- revisions to GDP and recession calls

- Fed struggles, maybe even Trump jumps over the fence and takes over

- cabinet reshuffles (eg. Lutnick or Navarro ejected, Bessent runs away)

You say "there was a mismatch between what was promised and what is possible". I agree but not in terms of pain, but of outcomes. I fear that the rebalancing will never arrive or will be smaller than expected. For example, no company is going to commit to big capex investments if things change in 2-4 years. That won't stop them from announcing future investments of "hundreds of billions" as the Admin says. Like DOGE, it all feels like a TV reality show where capturing attention with glitter and drama, day by day, aims to mask a much more complicated and different reality. A reality where real change usually only happens with constant effort and discipline (not edicts and pyres).

By the end of this process there will be a reconning, and the blue collar vote that propelled him will turn to a more extreme and protectionist flavor. Under this scenario, BTC, an orthogonal bet to the system is a good diversifying strategy.

BTW guys, this nostr thing is an awesome therapeutical machine! Thanks!!

Great post man!

You seem to articulate yourself well judging by your profile. Followed!

Its always the feds fault tho

https://m.primal.net/QEdl.mp4

Starting my crypto trading journey has been an incredible experience, especially with the guidance of my manager’s new trading plan. The financial progress I’ve made is beyond what I expected earning $150,000 is a great milestone for someone new to this space. The support from the company has been outstanding. If you're looking to get started, I highly recommend reaching out to Mrs. Susan. You can email her at susandemorirs@gmail.com or message her on WhatsApp at +1 (472) 218-4301. She’s been instrumental in my success