On Wednesday, Senate GOP, who were outraged about Chokepoint 2.0 and vowed to stop debanking, voted to get rid of a CFPB rule that stops debanking in payments apps like PayPal, Venmo and Zelle.

Chokepoint 2.0 had the potential to change the financial system for the better – to reform AML, CFT, and the Bank Secrecy Act, which are the *actual* causes of debanking.

Instead, "a certain cadre of self-serving, feckless narcissist" chose to design an orchestrated disinformation campaign against the only financial agency fighting for consumers, that – purely coincidentally – would have fined their projects by the millions.

Backed by Thiel minions and a16z talking heads, Chokepoint 2.0 invents an alternate reality in which big tech is the victim that somehow always wins.

Full pathetic story:

https://www.therage.co/gop-vote-to-legalize-debanking-following-debanking-outcry-2/

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The name of your website is fitting because every time I read your posts I certainly feel the rage

🫡

Don't agree with you on this one but I love how you continually challenge our assumptions and stand up for privacy. Keep up the fight.

Ironically and unintentionally this makes Bitcoin more attractive to US folks. But in general I prefer a better world than this type of corrupt nonsense.

nostr:note18czlv5ua3te00wv0eetkzrwlcr69tggwydn5xdpvl304akpxe8uqcjyl8v

hmmmm, how do you mean?

More debanking makes Bitcoin an attractive alternative for those who get debanked.

Contact of mine just got debanked. Turbo normie just became a precoiner.

Not only the US Sjors, I have been debanked by my Belgian bank, bankers and politicians alike enjoy the power they have over the pleps and no one stands up against them

Only the US is dismantling a government organization that tried to reduce debanking. But indeed debanking is a global issue, if you can get a bank account in the first place.

Bankers should never have been given the possibility to de-bank their customers, they act like police without any descent investigation, communist methodology

Banks are businesses, so if the government decides they can't reject customers, that sounds fairly communist too.

how was meta not a victim?

I didn't understand. Can someone explain in retard?