Should we trust books (edited and manipulated during 2.000 years) that talk about people who may have been liars?

If cristhian God is the right one, why doesnt he proves it clearly instead of giving us a book like every other religion has?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

He didn't just give us a book. That would be closer to a Protestant heresy called sola scriptura, i.e. Bible alone. That's not historical either. Jesus never wrote a book himself, rather he established a church that has existed for 2000 years. Again, it's historical.

There are extrabiblical books of history that witness to the existence of Jesus and his followers as well. It's not just a religion based on a fairytale book.

There Is a Lot Of religions with a Lot Of churches funded by a founders figures like Mahoma

Yes, there Is historical proof that he existed, that doesnt proof that he did miracles, its just paper you can believe

Because he rose from the dead and people still say "why does he prove it clearly?"

He rose from the dead or there is a 2.000 years old paper that says that he rose from the dead?

Did you saw it?

"Did you saw it?"

If so, I'm sure you would say you can't believe your eyes. You would find other explanations.

because religion is about faith and surrender in the heart of the person.

it isnt about peoples worldview being proved beyond any doubt.

I know, but faith is part of cristhiany and every other religion

Faith is part of atheism, too. It just doesn't have the evidence that Christianity has behind it.

Lol, maximum cope