Should we trust books (edited and manipulated during 2.000 years) that talk about people who may have been liars?
If cristhian God is the right one, why doesnt he proves it clearly instead of giving us a book like every other religion has?
Should we trust books (edited and manipulated during 2.000 years) that talk about people who may have been liars?
If cristhian God is the right one, why doesnt he proves it clearly instead of giving us a book like every other religion has?
He didn't just give us a book. That would be closer to a Protestant heresy called sola scriptura, i.e. Bible alone. That's not historical either. Jesus never wrote a book himself, rather he established a church that has existed for 2000 years. Again, it's historical.
There are extrabiblical books of history that witness to the existence of Jesus and his followers as well. It's not just a religion based on a fairytale book.
There Is a Lot Of religions with a Lot Of churches funded by a founders figures like Mahoma
Yes, there Is historical proof that he existed, that doesnt proof that he did miracles, its just paper you can believe
Because he rose from the dead and people still say "why does he prove it clearly?"
because religion is about faith and surrender in the heart of the person.
it isnt about peoples worldview being proved beyond any doubt.