Replying to Avatar mbarulli

I put myself in the camp of those not really willing to use Bitcoin to purchase goods and services, and I agree with nostr:npub1m0sxqk5uwvtjhtt4yw3j0v3k6402fd35aq8832gp8kmer78atvkq9vgcru that this is a problem. He recently wrote:

> "We have more bitcoin merchants than Bitcoiners willing to spend. We don’t need more merchant adoption, but spenders adoption."

I believe that the "spend-replace" practice needs to be a no-brainer.

I used this approach a couple of times for fairly large purchaes I made. However, it meant that each time I had to complete the BTC payment with my wallet, then move the fiat equivalent of the bitcoin I spent to an exchange, then use that money to purchase BTC at a rate different from the one applied for the initial BTC payment to the merchant, then move the new BTC out of the exchange and back to my wallet.

Of course, this is very annoying and not sensible for small purchases. In those cases, it makes more sense to replace multiple BTC spendings with a single BTC purchase. However, doing this manually and on a regular basis, is going to be complex and time-consuming.

A more convenient solution would be to have your wallet automatically manage the "spend-replace" process in collaboration with services like nostr:npub1sqzr42dj8vx32yd5jcvvl3ytux45kl0etgf6y2ymjvmd7lqmuwmqk9vk7v, nostr:npub1yadzn065lkghcg7puhp2kn96tp79fzysq4j0vku9kntaa9j2cr2s3n98zt, nostr:npub19mf4jm44umnup4he4cdqrjk3us966qhdnc3zrlpjx93y4x95e3uq9qkfu2, etc.

I could simply receive an alert saying:

"Threshold reached! It's time to replace your Bitcoins!

Transfer xxx EUR/USD to Relai/Bittr/Well/... bank account to purchase approx. YYY BTC that will be received right in this wallet.".

I would immediately switch to a wallet offering this feature!

(/cc nostr:npub1eaadqhuwn80gatdml02u58q0nd65nx7wqur5je4jwa5gef0p6unqrx54mw, nostr:npub1lr2zzf989mvf393y0tv39ara6a4vddkd6y87z784up9vl6ks6j3qtudl6a that recently posted about this topic)

Merchants must save in Bitcoin. Many people will grow their own food in their back yards before they spend the hardest money they have. The adoption curve has to complete before spending bitcoin becomes a desirable outcome. I have given people bitcoin with the hope that it motivates them to study it. If they just sell it for fiat currency after I spent months trying to explain it's value to them it feels like a slap in the face.

Merchants are even scarier because you don't know if they just sell it for cash immediatly/automatically. Then the recipient of your spend is unknown to you. It might be coinbase getting your bitcoin on some back end api.

There are good ways people manage to spend and earn in feasable circular ways, it's just not going to be the next big thing for another cycle or two.

More hodlers would have to survive a cycle or two for spending to increase.

Think of each cycle as generations reproducing.

The first meaningful cycle of adoption (population boom) was the 2016 cycle. We need more cycles to have more bitcoiners who did not fall in the bear market battle.

We are already in a much better place than we were two years ago with regards to merchant adoption, I'm just stingy, would rather give bitcoin away to teach an individual before I spend it.

If merchants can mine fiat, they can save in bitcoin.

It's the Saylor way. And he's smiling.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.