Subnostr

Wow, I was just playing around with the new version of nak by nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 , with it you can create your bunker in seconds to sign remotely on any client that supports nip-46. Just download the utility from the https://github.com/fiatjaf/nak repository, there you will find instructions on how to run it, once installed use the command `nak bunker --prompt-sec wss://` to start the bunker with the relay of your choice as coordinator, then once it has run it will ask you to set your nsec, after that you are all set to sign messages remotely using your own bunker!

I have recorded a short demo

https://media.nostr.build/av/1f14384e94665125e13524471899962d456c69114dc4f09d3c97dae0daf37300.webm

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

fiatjaf 2y ago

I see you prefer the terminal on the left and the browser on the right. Are you left-handed?

Gzuuus 2y ago

Very good observation skills, yes, I am mostly left-handed, why is this interesting? XD

fiatjaf 2y ago

Maybe left-handed people prefer the terminal on the left.

balas 2y ago

it makes more sense to have the input on the left and ouput on the right ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Fabian 2y ago

This is great! going to try it also. nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 I see the connection string is a bit different than I remember when integrating Pablo’s version, does it work the same or is this a different spec?

Gzuuus 2y ago

Same spec, just change the prefix from nsecbunker to just bunker

fiatjaf 2y ago

It's the same. We must agree on a connection string. I think people like the "bunker://" notation, so we must convince nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft to implement it.

But we should also implement the NIP-05 custodial flow he is working on. I am not sure what are the necessary changes, but should be minimal.