Replying to Avatar Sourcenode

I've had a couple days to reflect on the Putin interview and watch how others have reacted to it.

This post may trigger some, but I have no control over how people choose to interpret what they read.

First, I will say Putin and Russia's military actions are reprehensible. I will never be an advocate for big government, war, or any sort of violence.

That being said I have not found a major point from the conversation that I disagree with. I am not an expert in European history so I can't comment on the accuracy of the first thirty minutes, but regarding the current global state of affairs, it seems Putin has a grasp on the reality of the situation. He seems to be exclusively focused on Russia's best interest and he resisted several opportunities to trash his opponents.

In comparison, the US has been screaming about Russia interfering in elections and blaming them for our inflation. Neither of these claims have been proven and the latter is completely ridiculous from a monetary policy perspective.

The arguments I have heard against Putin's position have largely been character attacks or appeals to emotion. Both are worth considering, but lack logos. So far I have not heard a logical rebuttal of his claims.

I would like to hear rational arguments against his position if anyone has some points to share.

I have no desire to argue Russia's position or any other nation. My primary interest has always been in fostering peace and a greater understanding of the world we live in.

So in Putin's telling the expulsions, mass murders, rapes, and famines, of 1910-1950 either didn't really happen or were just minor mistakes.

Sadly, they did and until very late in USSR that was minimised or completely denied in the official history. So people nursed their grievances, passed them down through the kitchen table, told their kids not believe the teachers, told their kids to smile and learn Russian. Told them one day, it will be our turn.

Putin (and tbh most Russian's) understanding of their immediate neighbours excludes their rawest and most important unresolved history.

That's dangerous and tragic. Countries like Ukraine and Poland who's partisans committed terrible atrocities can and do just blame Russia instead of owning that responsibility. Russia also provokes them every time it errects another Stalin statue or similar.

Russia in turn reacts to every criticism or attempt to limit it's influence as a plot by "enemies" as these are "little brothers" it protected and industrialised (even though in fact most were significanly more developed than Russia pre-WW2). Poles have been treated so kindly by us, if they say these things it is the CIA. Or NGOs, gays, whatever.

I'm not saying the CIA doesn't do it's best to inflame this. But can I tell you everytime a Russian nationalists opens their mouth on RT it does a thousand times more. No one wants to end up like the Volga Germans, the Karelians, or the Kazan in the 40s. And unlike the average Fox TV viewer they have learned those names at school.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Thanks for the historical/cultural insight.

Ultimately the stupidest part of the interview seems to have been the first thirty minutes.

If he hadn't gone on that long political history rant the conversation would have been much more rational. In the context of what I have seen in these replies that portion just seems like an over-complicated way to cope with guilt.

Is Russia really putting up new statues of Stalin?