It was even well studied by ExxonMobil scientists who were financially incentivised to keep it quiet, in the 1970s and 80s, well before this became a popular narrative.
You didn't say which of the three points you thought was scientifically the weakest.
You are free to believe or deny whatever you like... I follow the scientific method not "scientific consensus" ✌️
Consensus should have nothing to do with science, it's like a distributed system having a consensus about the time. Ever heard of the Time Warp Attack? This is a form of exploit against a time consensus, caused by a vulnerability in the network time consensus. This is why Bitcoin doesn't have one, it just allows a couple of hours difference, and it can indeed allow non-monotonic timestamps on blocks. I personally think it will eventually be exploited.
I worked in Oil & Gas for 15 years, friend... I know what goes into company-sponsored studies 😂
