If you think it matters how it was created you start to sound like Marx

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

How can you interpret a piece of art without asking yourself about the context in which it was created, or by understanding the artist behind the work?

How is that the same thing?

I don't understand how Marx's theories fit into it? Could you elaborate?

Labour theory of value

I don’t believe this conversation is about the economic value of art.

There you have the answer to your question

If I’m understanding you correctly, you’re saying that the value of art lies in what it “is”, not in how it was made.

Let’s find the truth is temporal mechanical systems.

Entertainment is a good way to embrace fiction rather needing faith.

A longer journey to create the science to explain the most basic concepts of evolution into a temporal understanding, rather than quantum.

There is more to it than just entertainment, since the very understanding which comes with the pudding implodes primordial cores, the linchpins of reality as we knew her.

Intelligence as beauty is in the mind of the beholder, and educating the beholder how to think is an outside the box onboarding requirement where binary intelligence can think inside the box.