Give a simpler explanation. If you want people to adopt monero or if you want bitcoin to add this to the base layer, you’re going to have to convince the nodes in a simpler way. https://video.nostr.build/95ccace291ed11b0cfa946bd3b4d6cd1ec8d33c9b38417f442ccad19110f5c46.mp4
Dude let's not pretend you or any bitcoiner combed thru a billion+ bitcoin transactions and made sure all input/outputs were good. You don't do that to all new transactions every ten minutes either.
You just run a node and pay zero attention like any Monero user
"But bro three people on the planet actually do that" So now you're trusting others to do it for you and be honest if they find it and not exploit it? What was the point of running a node then?
Yall make no sense
yup
In the beginning I’ve done that with my own transactions and looked through random ones in the mempool. After seeing it reliable, I stopped. However. I can’t do that with monero and the fact that the monero website itself claims that supply soundness is compromised in order to provide better privacy says a lot.
"I trust bitcoin because it's transparent and don't understand math"
i think we can safely disregard your opinion.
🥱 the opinion that matters most 
You can always tell when a maxi has lost all actual fact-based argument.
Because they pull out a fiat chart of relative speculative value as if it was meaningful.
If you’re going to commit logical fallacies (e.g. move the goalposts and straw man) then I’m just going to share the objective math that matters most.
I have not moved any goalposts.
Just continued to call out your obvious inconsistencies.
You are the one changing the subject, not I.
You’re a clown. The original post was about Snowden asking for more privacy on the base layer. I said that this won’t happen because a transparent blockchain allows for supply soundness. You argued something about zero proofs and other cryptographic shit. It’s irrelevant. You either disprove my claim or drop it. And since monero can’t even guarantee supply soundness with this same technology that you’d like to have on Bitcoin, then your arguments are pointless.
All that’s left for you to do is hard fork of Bitcoin with these zero proof concepts or stfu.
MAHDOOD the type of guy that praises Bitcoins decentralized ledger, then constantly posts centralized ledger price charts
MAHDOOD the type of guy that says he loves Bitcoins simple transparent auditability, but never takes advantage of it
MAHDOOD the type of guy that says things like "the market is always right" and "network effects" when referring to Bitcoin, but then tells you why it's wrong and can't explain Monero Darknet adoption
MAHDOOD the type of guy that talks about anonymity sets and hiding in large crowds, but then uses a transparent and pseudonymous blockchain
MAHDOOD the type of guy that talks about Bitcoin being permissionless digital cash, but then brings up permissioned white market transactions and CEX volume
In other words you havent made sure all Bitcoin transactions work out and that it's supply is sound
An advantage you don't take advantage of is hardly an advantage
Do you have evidence that the Bitcoin supply isn’t 21 million?
The onus is on you to prove it does because you are claiming it does (you want us to prove a negative)
This is logic 101
No actually the onus is on them to prove that their zero proof shit actually guarantees supply soundness. Since they’re proposing that Bitcoin should change the base layer.
