Twitter logic:
Environmental protestors blocking roads == bad, it's ok for them to be shot
German/Dutch farmers blocking roads == freedom fighters, sticking it to the man, heroes
Just showcasing the hypocrisy, I couldn't care less about either.
Discussion
Roads are fiat mentality.
Roads are a product of the State.
The "who would build the roads?" question, besides stupid, reveals a dark secret from the deep bottom of the statist mind.
Roads only exist because of the State. If it wasn't for the state we would be literally flying to go anywhere.
Let the "opposition" do good things, let them protest against the genocidal state of Israhell, let them protest for the environment (even if they're wrong in their perception of what is good and bad for the environment), let them do what they think is best. Focus on revealing truth. That's our focus, not fighting people that think they're doing the right thing, fooled by the powers that be.
"But they harm my business", no, your dependency on roads harms your business, the State harmed your business before it was even born.
“Where we’re going, we won’t need roads.” - Dr. Emmett Lathrop Brown
what are you supposed to do if you feel strongly that one group is retarded and the other group is fighting back against retardation?
That is different than claiming that type of protest is unacceptable in 1 case and ok in the other.
It's ok to have opinions and pick sides but at least apply the same judgment to everything otherwise you just pass on as a hypocrite. That in turn gets weaponized by "the other side" which just picks that up as a "gotcha".
All of that is avoidable if people just use their brains.
I agree. if one side says blocking roads is unacceptable and then later says its wonderful that some other group is blocking the road then that is indeed hypocritical