The same reason we should have deleted inscriptions despite their momentum 🙂
Like yeah we can do DVMs but is this really the spirit of the protocol?
nostr:nprofile1qqsrhuxx8l9ex335q7he0f09aej04zpazpl0ne2cgukyawd24mayt8gprfmhxue69uhkcmmrdd3x77pwve5kzar2v9nzucm0d5hszxmhwden5te0wfjkccte9emk2um5v4exucn5vvhxxmmd9ux73xm6 why delete something that’s gaining momentum? We’re already past 4 million DVM events, kind 5300 is crushing it, and deleting the spec without recommending anything better doesn’t help.
https://stats.dvmdash.live/kind-stats
Each DVM kind can have its own flow, NIP-90 flow is a suggestion, not a requirement.
Discussion
We have other marketplaces on Nostr, so I think this can be in the spirit. The spec hasn't really been updated since it was first proposed, and it needs a number of updates.
nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpkscaxrqqs8nhaynsahuz6c6jy4wtfhkl2x4zkwrmc4cyvaqmxz3qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshsz9nhwden5te0vfjhvmewdehhxarjxyhxxmmd9uq3xamnwvaz7tmsw4e8qmr9wpskwtn9wvhsqg878vwyhhwjgfpqpygnuemvz3hvpvj6c3xgc0f5wh5k3a9udzyl9qt6k8fw