Replying to Avatar Ava

PSA: The Epoch Times is a far right extremist publication by the Falun Gong new religious movement (read that, alien cult) folks in China.

"A former Epoch Times reporter who covered the 2016 campaign, Steve Klett, said his editors had encouraged favorable coverage of Trump after he won the Republican nomination, and that "they seemed to have this almost messianic way of viewing Trump as the anti-Communist leader who would bring about the end of the Chinese Communist Party."

Any "take" they have will be extremely biased to their agenda.

"Elise Thomas of the Institute for Strategic Dialogue noted, "Falun Gong has a history of rejecting modern medicine, which obviously intersects neatly with the beliefs of many anti-vax communities." Ben Hurley said, "They've been anti-medicine for a long time. Ex-believers know many people that have died from treatable conditions.

It's their belief that they don't need medicine, because they're superhuman beings."

"Former Epoch Times employees have noted Falun Gong practitioners' involvement in the management and editorial process. Three anonymous former employees said Epoch Times workers were encouraged to attend weekly "Fa study" sessions outside work hours to study Li's teachings.

Former employees have said that criticizing The Epoch Times amounts to disobeying Li."

"Falun Gong is entirely based around the teachings of its autocratic founder and leader: China-born Li Hongzhi.

According to NBC News, to his followers, Li is "a God-like figure who can levitate, walk through walls and see into the future.

His ultra-conservative and controversial teachings include a rejection of modern science, art and medicine, and a denunciation of homosexuality, feminism and general worldliness."

Hongzhi instructs his followers to downplay his controversial teachings when speaking to outsiders."

#cybersecgirl #media

nostr:nevent1qqsy4njmc9neh7rh0xj8hmxrs459pvavn062p00pka2yvyp5evv27zcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyr2f4ypr5gwm5xeusvrv5d5m7vjrmz6yhrctd5gevcrl0vyep75d7qcyqqqqqqgjkscx7

So your response to coverage of how govt controlled media outlets clearly lied about the effectiveness of an award winning drug to allow pharma corps to push their extremely harmful gene therapy jabs under emergency approval laws is to attack the outlet reporting on the issue?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I hear it’s called “Ad Hominem” and means the argument and or facts are wrong

There was no data on the effectiveness of IVM against covid 19 at the time and even today IVM doesn’t look very useful. Unless I missed a recent study?

It knocks out all symptoms very quickly. Have experienced it personally & seen the same in all friends & family members who would listen. Unlike the myocarditis & cancer causing jabs that only seem to increase your chances of getting sick, ivermectin appears to actually be 100% effective.

The govt along with "news" outlets & multiple "scientific" publications were actively working to prevent anyone from finding a viable treatment because of conflicts of interest with pharma corps & the revolving door between big pharma & govt regulatory bodies. There won't ever be a study because the whole mess has been corrupted by trillions in money printing. If ivermectin had been recognized as a treatment then the administering of all gene therapy jabs would have to be immediately discontinued & billions in tax dollars would stop flowing to pharma corps & govt cronies.

Everything is & has been upside down for quite some time. People who continue to trust universities & establishment "experts" will not live long happy lives. Many of the jabbed and boosted are already headed for an early grave, a bunch of the booster crazy people I know now have aggressive cancers. It's horrible what has been done to people.

I personally know more people that have gotten cancer since covid then people who were hospitalized for covid, and they were all vaxxed.

Same

Same

By now, many infections are asymptomatic, so it’s hard to tease that away from the action of IVM. There are plenty of IVM vs COVID-19 studies since 2020, very little evidence it should be a preferred treatment for COVID-19. Unless there is evidence of it, I don’t think IVM was buried for the sake of selling vaccines. Pharma could easily have developed a next gen IVM (or reformulated it for IP, had it been promising) and sold it just the same. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869

Asymtomatic infections are & always were just nonsense.

You underestimate the malicious nature of the things the people in power aim to do.

You can avoid reality, but you will not be able to avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.

Viruses often evolve towards being asymptomatic, not sure if COVID-19 is going down that path but I wouldn’t be surprised (I think people thought this was the case with the omicron variant but I haven’t kept up)

Seriously this is some Olympic level mental gymnastics. It’s not an opinion piece. I can’t read past the paywall but it seems pretty obvious they’re just covering the case and quoting what people said about it. Who gives an actual fuck about the author’s beliefs?