You bet I do. Link below 👇🏻
Discussion
Thanks! On first reading it seems pretty legit - I’ve got to knock the cobwebs off my statistics vocabulary to make sure I’m understanding it accurately, but definitely can’t just hand wave that paper away….
Absolutely and the sample size was also statistically significant and over a long enough time frame. What’s even more interesting is that the docs were pro vaxx but when they did an objective study it came out the exact opposite of what they were hoping to find.
I’ve had a lot of physiology and pathophysiology courses over the years and anyone that says they understand it all is full of shit. If the study is done in good faith and the methods are solid, ya have to take it seriously.
At the end of the day, it warrants thorough objective analysis and scrutiny esp of the study design. At the very least it’s a signal that something is awry with jabs
Are there folks replicating the study you know of with different populations now to see if this was an anomaly or not?
To my knowledge, no. This study wasn’t even published in journals because the doctors who did it were afraid of being cancelled so they sat on it since 2020 when they completed it, until now.