Dave: And no one came to help old Dave then. Dave had to pretend to be somebody else.

Celeste: You mean, all those years ago… when you were a little boy, Dave?

Dave: Dave’s dead. I don’t know who came out of that cellar, but it sure as shit wasn’t Dave!

Mystic River (2003), directed by our boy Clint Eastwood, is classified as a neo-noir film.

It's a 10/10, but make no mistake — it’s fucking intense! Watch it only when you’re mentally prepared to dive into something dark and emotionally heavy.

The story unfolds artfully and deliberately, trusting the audience’s intelligence rather than spoon-feeding every detail. It draws you in, making you deeply invested in the story.

A flawless 10/10 — as you’d expect from anything with or by Clint Eastwood!

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp0jpvdhrumf0ax0qv5sqmj9fqd8ez2qxflwd8xm456vretj4cjgfqyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qqsv8s2p56fm7k44jvgt4ad4pc4zx8wnlfv069yvfal83s67jzph25cz3l8kz

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Oh man, I'd forgotten about this movie! Was good, yet heavy. Neo-noir is a cool label, but yet sure the meaning.

Better than adding “post” to it and leaving the meaning as some hashtag definition

ex: Postmodernist

Yeah, I'm terrible with all the various namings for some reason. Music, art styles, books, philosophy, architecture...can never keep them straight

I thought film noir meant anti-heros (or maybe "grey area" heros or something), stormy vibes, and mostly detective stories 🤷‍♀️

I think there’s an obligatory saxaphone in the soundtrack of film noir movies.

Wait wait, sorry.

Not “movies”, that’s so mainstream.

“Films”.

I'm thinking Maltese Falcon. Rainy. "I knew she was trouble when I first saw her...but damn it, I ignored that voice" 🚬

Dude. Have you ever heard of the Bulwer-Lytton writing contest???

It’s ended now but it was a contest to write ridiculous intros to stories in the “it was a dark and stormy night” style.

Great stuff!

#writing

https://www.bulwer-lytton.com

No, will have to come back to this. More coffee must be made first!

I am convinced that the bizarre naming conventions are just another way to maintain exclusivity, like having a cassette tape of some indie band that barely anyone has even heard of.

“Ooh, what an I listening to? Yeah I got this tape at one of the only two shows they ever did. They started their own genre, that’s how indie they are, bro. Their music is postexistentialistpostvaporwavepostemopunkelectronica. You wouldn’t know, ha.”

A bit of that for sure. It is also useful though, in its time, to track shifts in themes/styles, but can get confusing when you try to reconcile the evolving categories over time. Philosophy is prob the worst offender

Very useful historically, when studying architecture, fine art, etc,

but folks are just making up terms now and getting more upset when you mislabel their genre.

Electronic music def falls into this category. I don't even know the right term for the stuff I like. Is it dub-techno, EDM, minimal bedroom-house? And further refinements I'm too unaware of to even list here

Same music problem here.

At this point I just know what I like.

Philosophy is definitely the worst of these. Totally agree.

The story’s so haunting and intense, I think I’ma be prepared to rewatch it 5 years later!

Recall it has to do with child abuse...Kevin bacon was in it...but not much else. May be time to rewatch