Replying to Avatar Fabian

Could give an example?

If you have to add special rules to handle kind 20, you can also add special rules for kind 1 with k-tag 20

Existing clients don’t need to add anything and everything would still work.
Avatar
Fabian 4mo ago 💬 1

Could you give*

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Laeserin 🇻🇦 4mo ago 💬 1

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzphtxf40yq9jr82xdd8cqtts5szqyx5tcndvaukhsvfmduetr85ceqyw8wumn8ghj7emfw33kjarpv3jkctnwdaehgu339e3k7mf0qyt8wumn8ghj7emjv4jkuum0w4kzuumsv93k2tcqyqprzlz55d0dzn6zlmn8g8wqz66mqhggy89fkh9jza9p5jndyq48y0l6vct

Avatar
Fabian 4mo ago 💬 1

If the embedded kind 20 in this example was kind 1 with k-tag 20 all could work the same, all the information is in the event. But with kind 20 its broken for existing clients that haven’t implemented it yet

Avatar
Laeserin 🇻🇦 4mo ago 💬 2

If its kind 1, then it wouldn't be a gallery item, tho. 🤔

Avatar
Fabian 4mo ago

I'm not sure where this “gallery item” is defined but with kind 1 k-tag 20 I would call it a “backwards compatible gallery item”

Avatar
Laeserin 🇻🇦 4mo ago 💬 1

It's not backwards compatible. It's a totally different data structure and ends up in different feeds.

I select kind 20 and kind 1, specifically.

I'm more interested in kind 20 handling multiple images in one event, so that I can group similar pictures, in the gallery.