🇺🇸 Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming all rejected bills for a state Strategic #Bitcoin Reserves over volatility concerns.
"Game over theory!"
:reward: Share > Like > Comment = ⚡️21
:topreward: Top Comment = ⚡️500
(For 24 hrs Only)
Discussion
They will get ₿itcoin at the price they deserve, just like the rest of us.
Exactly, they will come back in 5 years and pay through the nose.
It's good 🧡⚡
Bravo 👏
Awesome, cheap sats are coming to me 🤣
excellent
excellent
amazing
awesome
I am kind of neutral on this
Seguir apilando sats⚡es el Plan
👍
Yesir
It would have been more profitable for them to buy Bitcoin at 91K,
What news
Interesting topic this ... They must study BTC and you will see that they will always win and be positive
Who will be the next?
As it stands Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming, Pennsylvania, and Mississippi have unfortunately wimped out. Utah, Arizona, Texas and Georgia are pushing forward. Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota have introduced bills. And the following states have not made a move Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin. (Determined using GPT4o/search).
Texas and Florida means a lot. Which other state can make the difference? California?
👏🏻👍🏻
Nice 👍
Really? Could anybody let them know that the volatility is a feature, not a bug?!
This is better. The state should stay away from getting involved in this.
Short-term volatility blinds many to Bitcoin’s long-term resilience
Más tarde entrarán, todos tienen derecho a equivocarse
Oh wow, that will create some Nice FUD regarding the BTC Reserve narrative. 🫣
State lawmakers just nixed bills for strategic #Bitcoin reserves, citing volatility concerns. But is it really game over? Volatility is the price of innovation. While traditional institutions hide behind fear, Bitcoin’s inherent risk is what fuels its disruptive power. Real progress isn’t built on certainty—it’s built on challenging the status quo. Game over theory? Not by a long shot.
Well it's game over for those states.
Predictable
The ebbs & flows of political whims shouldn't drive one's understanding of real money. 'The market' reacts and I just keep stacking Sats.
Bitcoin doesn't need the government. The government needs Bitcoins. It's just taking them a while to figure it out.
👌
Well, nothing. If they bought now, they would have strengthened the network
Nature is volatile :super: