Theres no " main" economic nodes to point at. This is why we say you must run your node to broadcast your txs. There are certainly nodes that can have more TXs broadcast through them but you must pay the fee everytime you do so.

So lets say for arguments sake certain bad actors with alot of bitcoin wish to try to influence a fork one or or the other.

As they " spend" their coins with fees the stacks they have will inevitably diminish as most of them would want to simultaneously coordinate expenditures to influence which way the miners lean. This would in turn drive up fees higher each block therefore eroding the malicious actors stacks of bitcoin as they spent them with only the intention of influencing the fork instead of actual economic activity.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Wouldn't you say coinbase is a strong economic node? They very a massive amount of transactions every day.

Yes but they tx on behalf of others not themselves technically. The only way they could do so in their own interest is be defrauding their custody arrangements and just sending coins out and back to themselves? Thus spending coins in fees that arent thier own? That doesnt seem like a plausible strategy to me.