I think platforms that adopt this would lose trust. It would have to be ubiquitous.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Why? Users would be getting paid to browse their feed.

OK, let's take that a bit further. Why even have it look like it came from someone else? Why not paid fraud (impersonation) using cold hard sats?

We are talking about sending a message right? Fuck it. Go all the way with it.

It does not cause impersonated accounts, that is a separate issue. Also, spending a bunch of sats to fake a user is probably a poor investment since the fake user is going to get muted out of peoples' web of trusts.

I doubt that it must lead to a poor investment. I would obviously consent to the speech.

Something better than nip05 is needed to prove authenticity. Maybe it's web of trust. But point is if you pay to fake a user, and then you get muted, all you achieved was to provide some free promotion for the real user.

Want to do an experiment? Say I want you to make a post that defames Ross Albricht. It is a logically sound argument, but you normally wouldn't say such a thing yourself due to whatever bias you have.

To fill the gap of the bias, a negotiation or offer is made to 'get the word out'. Well, now I am incentives to accept the offer. It sounds rational on its face, and I could use the money.