its a valid transaction and they paid the fees to make it. the only thing that fixes ordinal inscriptions is higher value transactions with higher fees. this fad will get priced out when they get bored or run out of sats.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The fee argument does not hold up. Do you run a node? Have you seen the consequence on this one?

i run a node. i'm not sure what you're saying "doesn't hold up" or what i'm supposed to be seeing in my node to prove your point. what's the consequence?

What I mean by this is that it is not because they pay fees that we should let them undermine the network.

Since the inscriptions arrived, the UTXOs set has been increasing at a very high speed, which threatens the nodes with low resources.

You can see it right here: https://statoshi.info/d/000000009/unspent-transaction-output-set?orgId=1&refresh=5s&from=now-1y&to=now&viewPanel=8

nostr:note1xg5840zzucmct9lgq3rmclj0xcuff4d88taxsgf8dc7rj37cmt2smf74ka

Ah, I see your point. That part is an issue for sure.

Well then.

Inscriptions are a #backdoor and a #frontdoor to #fuckup #Bitcoin. They're an attack on Bitcoin and the Bitcoin protocol. They have to go.

The security and the robustness of Bitcoin is based on basically everyone having the ability to run a full node.

One of the many reasons that #ethereum is fucked is because very few can afford to run a so-called #ethereum node..#Bitcoin 👑🗽

We have to call for an immediate #suspension of #inscriptions so we can reevaluate the cost benefit ratio of allowing them in the Bitcoin protocol.

If #Bitcoin core refuses to act. Then I call on those of you that can to suspend or strip inscriptions from the code. Then test and release to the community, ASAP

Until Bitcoin core can get it's #shit together..🧡👑🗽