What if in the case of Alaska UBI the state was removed and it was oil company directly to individual/family?

Or small communities agreeing with a fediment system and then doing it that way?

See, I even see govt issued UBI as an improvement to our current system (depending on funding mechanisms), so maybe we disagree there

I don't think we would need MORE state, we would need a state that actually works. Yes, governments do own businesses, and those businesses do what they are mandated to do. If a government established a charter for a company that would receive capital, use that capital to buy and operate Bitcoin miners and then distribute the profits to all citizens that live within the jurisdiction of that government, then that is what it would do. That's a basic governance system to set it up and make it work.

There's a difference between hating our current government because they are incompetent idiots doing a bad job, vs. hating the very idea of governance, which would include the pooling of resources to fulfill a goal. I don't think we're ready to tell an AI to do all the work and give humans the profits of that work. So we are going to have to trust SOMEONE SOMEWHERE to do SOMETHING.

We can take this out of the hands of politicians by building smart contracts that distribute sats that are generated by miners. Make the requirement to change those smart contracts a 99% buy in from everyone involved in the system. You'll never get it, so the system won't be changed.