Nostr Web Client

That was my initial line of thinking, but he’s right in saying that amplifying the content is a value add allowing someone to participate in support without even having to spend a sat. I prefer sharing over a like. Did you still feel this way after hearing this point?

nen 2y ago

not quite. i still think people should be allowed to make decisions (to support or not to support) on their own – or maybe i still childishly believe in things like radiohead’s “in rainbows” experiment.

at least i can tell for myself, i’m fine with some likes/reposts/replies to my posts and zero sats coming from it

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

jack 2y ago

They still can

nen 2y ago

… by not interacting – even they want to – because they have no sats?

jack 2y ago

Interact with repost or comment/reply

⚡️🌱🌙 2y ago

👍 is fiat

⚡️ is POW

Reply is POW

Joe Milliken 2y ago

#repost are desperately under utilized at present.

🍊 ando 💊 2y ago

I’m doing my best Jack. Did a quick repost too!!

BRETT ⚓️ 2y ago

🫂⚡️

bitcoinstate 2y ago

Comments are equivalent to sending lightning satoshis to the poster, the respondent, as well as the client and repeater.

alanajoy 2y ago

I’m fine with it also, but did feel satisfied with the counter of amplifying if one can’t afford. They giving the content more visibility you’re increasing the impact of the content you appreciate while opening it up to compensation from others in your network. That’s a money-free value add IMO

nen 2y ago

so, we both agreed that having a free alternative for those who would like to but can’t afford to support is a good thing – that’s nice 💞

alanajoy 2y ago

Yes! 🫶

⚡️🌱🌙 2y ago

🤔

Extreme poverty is defined by the UN, as living on 9,500 sats / day

A zap can be 1 sat

1 sat = $0.00024

Zaps are themselves not exclusionary to any human, they are exclusionary to machine automation on an industrial scale.

hello 🪺 2y ago

i totally paid to get the cd. :)