I don't get it. I thought she was a well researched individual with proof.

I feel like her book probably is full of what ifs and no proofs now. I never read it, but from the interviews, I assumed she had based her statements on evidence but always took them with a pinch of salt.

I just don't think she could possibly have enough evidence to back her claims here.

Its also very vague and wishy washy and uses buzz words like "Epstien"... is epstein the center of EVERYTHING bad and evil in the world??!