No, skin in the game is what enforces genuineness over the long haul. Because there’s a cost for being full of shit.
And you don’t judge the truth of something based on credentials. You judge the motives/ of someone who works for Pfizer based on the fact that you know they must say and believe what they’re saying otherwise they couldn’t work there.
"Skin in the game" as you define it promotes group think.
Just go look at any other social media platform...
Please Login to reply.
without skin in the game you have people who stand for nothing, Other social media platforms could deplatform you. Now that’s no longer possible.
you can have skin in the game here with your social graph
