If I wanna send 100 usd I will use you on chain #Bitcoin unless we playin. if Im sending 10 cuckbucks Im using Lightning. The amounts cutoff is your personal tradeoff. I always prefer to receive on chain Bitcoin when the amount of sats is significant. You can choose what you prefer.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

See this is fine. Lightning is a tool, use it as you wish and at the length you wish. But just straight up not using it is what baffles me. I like receive on chain to never touch, the only time I touch my on-chain is to open up new channels to spend with.

I mostly like your take. But I’d also like to see more I-save-in-Bitcoin boomers to use on chain. Testing Bitcoin for 15 cents transactions so they ready for the future. Bitcoin on chain transactions are so fucking cheap for so long its a shame so few use them.

I’ll never make a lightning transaction over a few hundred dollars anyway due to my channel capacity. Everything larger is onchain

Yeah. There’s a meme understood to be true that Bitcoin transactions are expensive and it didn’t age very well.

Set it to 1 sat/vbyte and forget it spend less than a dollar on fees. True that it’s definitely a misconception

Yep