Subnostr

But we also shouldn’t be stubborn. If the fear is only the decentralization of the network. We are on a trajectory of cheaper storage always. By then it will be ok to increase the size.

HoloKat 1y ago

Induced demand

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

TKay 1y ago

Demand for storage, will lead to the production of more storage.

My point is, would you still be against block size increase of storage was dirt cheap?

HoloKat 1y ago

No. Larger block size will lead to greater demand to stuff it with garbage.

HoloKat 1y ago

Yes, against.

TKay 1y ago

I totally agree. And I’m in that camp.

But then clearly the fear is not centralization. So let’s just put that argument aside. If we keep using it, it’s very easy to dismantle.

We just don’t want garbage. I don’t want the garbage too.

HoloKat 1y ago

It could very well lead to centralization. If you keep letting more garbage in and justifying the ever expanding block size. In theory.

TKay 1y ago

Unfortunately the crap is here now. 🤷🏻‍♂️

I say undo the BIP. 😅

karl Black 1y ago

Yeah but we don’t need more of it. 🤞

karl Black 1y ago

Yes against - I want Bitcoin to be the hardest money there is. That’s it. No NFTs. No VC shit. No identification service.

HoloKat 1y ago

It’s all stupid rug pull scams

TKay 1y ago

100% with you on this.

That’s a protocol issue, not a size issue. Because this crap is on the network now, with the current size limit.

Making the block size smaller won’t fix it, it will only make it more valuable.