I would disagree that #Trump winning was a done deal. Trump doesn’t have the same popular support that he had in 2016 (look at the attendance of his rallies) because many of its core supporters felt they were fooled by his mismanagement of Covid-19 and the Qanon psyop in which he participated in. Also, #Kennedy polling at 20% is a threat to the two-party system. Whether or not this assassination attempt was a false flag, it’s clear that Trump will benefit. RFK is the one who will lose from this event.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah, i have to agree with you, it was not 100% sure, but risking a brain damage or even death just to get some more percentage to win against a decadent rival...maybe is not a good deal. I understand your point.

If it’s a false flag, I certainly don’t think that the shooter would have aimed at #Trump’s ear. He could have shot at a safe distance from him, aiming at the crowd. So if Trump’s ear really got blasted by a bullet, I would disregard the false flag scenario but so far, there is no definitive evidence that it’s what happened (and we’ll probably never have any way to verify this element).

You obviously haven't ever tried shooting a 223 at that distance, especially with wind.

I have not but are you implying that it would have been a gamble for a skilled shooter to avoid a target in these conditions?

Absolutely yes

There's no way he could have intentionally hit the ear, if that's what you're asking

I agree but that’s not what I’m suggesting could have happened. I actually discount the possibility that a shooter could have aimed and shoot at the ear. However, how sure can you be that Trump’s ear actually got pierce by a bullet? Do we have any definitive evidence? I don’t think so. What I’m suggesting is that the shooter could have shot at the crowd leaving enough safety margin to not hit Trump. It would still be a stunt with a level of risk for Trump but I think a skilled shooter could minimize the risk close to 0.

I mean, I'm going with "it was the bullet" unless some better explanation comes along.

I'd say that definitive evidence of this being an assassination attempt will come out when they try and poison him or blow him up with a truck bomb, I think there's only a 30% chance he makes it to the election (and same for Biden).

Ditto for Orban and Fico.

If Trump ends up being assassinated by a deep state operation I will concede that I was wrong but so far the my understanding is that Trump is an asset of the deep state. The deep state wants Trump to win the coming election.

According to this theory, the shooter is working for Trump, knows it’s just a PR stunt for ratings, intends to murder Trump supporters but miss Trump by a safe margin. And knows the SS will kill him. How would you convince anyone to do this?

Not exactly. This theory aligns the operating methods we’ve seen in past #FalseFag operations conducted by the #DeepState. Those often consist in relying on a #MKUltra asset (the shooter) and to shock the public to push or reinforce a narrative. This wouldn’t be an operation conducted by #Trump and its staff but by the deep state. There are many tangible elements demonstrating that Trump has numerous ties with the deep state including the Rothschild, Epstein and Soros. I recently posted some mirrored videos on my profile if you’re interested in understanding what I’m referring to.