Trezor is so aware that secure elements are an element of trust that it has kept the secure sd function in its Trezor 5 model with secure element.
When someone doesn't talk about this transparently it just comes across to me as a scammer.
There are also many critics of Jade because they call their virtual protection secure element mocking that it does not have secure element when it is one of the most elegant solutions in the industry for this problem.
Jade simply uses a multi-signature model to protect the seed (Local + remote server), thus avoiding having to use a secure element.
I never listen to this discussion on podcast.
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpl8hpfzul2qha25p8wd63gm46ufax95lfgnl8h9v84y3zt0k05m7qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3xamnwvaz7tmsw4e8qmr9wpskwtn9wvhsqg9c42zd0a49el902gm99u9797dpa5e6wkqmdhh52yc47kknw9lhusu2uaaq
nostr:nprofile1qqsw3znfr6vdnxrujezjrhlkqqjlvpcqx79ys7gcph9mkjjsy7zsgygpr9mhxue69uhhqatjv9mxjerp9ehx7um5wghxcctwvsq3samnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarjd93kztnrdaksz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ekk7um5wgh8qatz7tvu4p
Please Login to reply.
This is for all jade models or just the plus?