Bitcoin's core value proposition is its stability and predictability. The protocol rules shouldn't keep changing on a whim. Frequent tinkering undermines confidence. This is why there's so much drama over this tiny OP_RETURN change. We're the opposite of Monero.

Monero'ers seem okay with trusting a centralized team of developers to push major protocol changes and hardforks every six months with no debates or discussions. Everyone just accepts whatever the main developers do, updates their nodes with no second thought or worry about the consequences. Recipe for failure.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

There are plenty of debates and discussions going on all the time, but you are just oblivious to them because you arent involved with Monero (obviously)

Bitcoin Core isn't a centralized team of developers? They're 98% of node software.

>hardforks every six months

you have been repeatedly told that this is not what they do anymore and you know better than to keep lying about it

They hardforked every 6 months for years, it's a fact. They still hardfork, just less frequently now. What's your point?

>push major protocol changes and hardforks every six months

you still keep telling people that they do this even though you were repeatedly told that they stopped years ago

>with no debates or discussions

this is another easily disproved lie that you completely made up. the hard fork schedule was eliminated because of debates and discussions that you claim did not take place. every consensus change has debates and discussions that you pretend don't exist

you repeatedly lie when you criticize anything that isn't bitcoin