Is BCH a shitcoin or a better implementation of BTC? #Bitcoin

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You pays your moneys, you takes your choice.

How could you even come to this conclusion at this point?

I'm genuinely curious đź‘€.

Only ever 21 million, larger block size, perhaps having a architecture more suitable for a currency, etc etc. I had BTC in 2017 so I have BCH, hard fork and all.

Wow so you got absolutely rekt.

I made people a lot of money on their forks during that era by telling them to sell it all.

Seems like you're still coping with bad mechanics in your thesis leading to a poor outcome (pun intended).

I guess you answered a question here I wasn’t really asking. Anyone else have an opinion on the technical construct of Bitcoin Cash? Kim Dotcom seems to be an avid supporter….

Bitcoin cash attempted to change Bitcoin consensus, & failed.

Thee End.

đź’©

It's a shitcoin sir

Rationale?

What can you do with BCH you can't do with a more widely accepted crypto?

Their scaling solution (the whole reason for their fork) isnt a long term solution, it just kicks the can down the road until blocks are full at their new limit.

IMO monero with it's privacy by default and scaling blocksize fills the void much better IMO. For other defi stuff just use any of the many other more popular options.

Excellent points. Thank you.