It does not have to be a government.

You want it to be.

I do not.

I do not agree with the premise that a temporary mutual aid agreement requires permanent authoritarian structures ruling over a particular place or group of people.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

A militia, with no predefined hierarchy, without regular and required training, that people join or ignore, depending on what they had for lunch, is just a messy mob.

no, it's not. a local militia knows their own territory they must defend better than anyone, that's the whole point.

also, i don't believe it is possible that human power can endure. so their time is short.

and they are motivated by more than just money they're motivated to defend their homes, families, and the way of life their families enjoy.

I know groups that are not a messy mob and entirely voluntary . . . So . . . I respectfully submit that you are wrong.

Also, people in a militia can have a perfectly functioning hierarchy without there being any coercion. Again, I see it. And, in some ways, it is a growing thing.

Heck, that's how the early church was with the ecclesia. (Granted, there were leaders that were appointed through apostolic succession, but I am explicitly not conflating those with any human governance, as that is a separate thing. IMO.)

And yet they wiped the floor with SEALs in Operation Red Wings. SEALs didn't even get a shot off.

You underestimate the capabilities of non-state militias, ma'am.

The trick is getting them to train often-enough and remain up to date in the absence of a clear and present danger. No, I don't have an easy solution.