no i am not serious, let the <16 years old see this kind of content unwillingly and see what happens
Discussion
You think a child should expect flawless content safety from clients less than a year old dev’d by underpaid and understaffed teams accessing a relatively-brand-new immutable protocol?
Will is not responsible for parenting children. There is zero implication of expected child safety here.
damus is also 17+ and has blurred images/videos by default. I don’t know how people expect that a browser will be able to police the internet. Maybe when AI is good enough to detect “woman fucking a dog” in realtime on-device.
Oh, didn’t know it was 17+ on App Store, explains a lot 🤗
