Are you being serious? I imagine an AI image/video content screening service is extremely expensive or tough to code
nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s wen content warnings pls, we have younglings here šš„ŗ
Discussion
no i am not serious, let the <16 years old see this kind of content unwillingly and see what happens
You think a child should expect flawless content safety from clients less than a year old devād by underpaid and understaffed teams accessing a relatively-brand-new immutable protocol?
Will is not responsible for parenting children. There is zero implication of expected child safety here.
damus is also 17+ and has blurred images/videos by default. I donāt know how people expect that a browser will be able to police the internet. Maybe when AI is good enough to detect āwoman fucking a dogā in realtime on-device.
Oh, didnāt know it was 17+ on App Store, explains a lot š¤
What? You don't need AI. There is a NIP for this.
Damus does not support it AFAIK nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s
This doesnāt solve anything
does not solve this problem for this user. would be nice to have though. or are you opposed to that nip in general?
Itās effectively useless for these contexts while you have to trust the note author to opt-in. Maybe the exception would be good-faith adult content creators.
Better than nothing I guess
No it was my idea, damus web implemented it first. This nip author just codified it. It just doesnāt solve the problem of always screening ābadā content from users.
Why not just creat AI "dog videos" with appropriate disclosure and stick behind a paywall?
Just a #bimbos idea
People add 12 relays to their list, but Damus is the one to blame for showing them sex with a dog š¤£
There are kids safe relays where dogs only sing songs and dance.
Lmao. I heard those relays track their IP addresses and send them juice boxes and crackers
