I agree in general with your note, but I would be very carefull with regards to framing honest questioning of numbers, facts and general narratives as being denialist.
"Truth defends itself, lie needs the government"
In my opinion we should be always open to ask any questions we need, specially the hard ones in order for all to know the truth, whatever that may be. That would unite us against the horrors of totalitarian governments and help us avoid errors of the past.
For my part, I condemned both the deaths carried out by armed guerrilla groups as well as military groups from the state. I don't move a hair when I say it.
But the situation carried out by the state is much more serious in my opinion because the state must always be a guarantor of freedom and human rights (like how is VLLC! fashionable today).
The state can not be a a spy, murderous and torture machine with those who think or feel differently. Therein lies the fundamental difference and that's why we #Bitcoin ... Because history repeats itself over and over again.
In Germany, genocide denial is punishable by prison; here we are much more tolerant and democratic and we can give these talks friend.
Yes I know, what I fear is that any side resort to the power of state mandates to push its world view instead of doing the hard and painful work of open discussion. For example, number of deaths, accurate account of each side of the people involved, etc...
I think whatever comes out of that never ending proces of open debate is far superior, healthier and long lasting than any "stability" that is enforced by silencing any side.
We are all bised, but we are biased in different ways and that can be a good thing if we dare to speak our minds and listen. To speak and let others speak, and this also gives more legitimacy to whatever conclusion we arrive than pushing our narratives with force.
I think that will heal any historic wound far better. 🫂🧉
