So you are asking me that because it is "legal" it is morally ok for children who are underage to see manhood?
In case you do not have dictionary or I don't come across speaking in "English" I am referring to "adult content", p*rn videos that no child must be exposed to! However, I am in no illusion that these days kids cannot acess it if they have the means to do so.
Could I ask, is it ok with you for minors to be exposed on those content? I mean regardless of platform, as an adult yourself?
It's simply unavoidable.
In some territories I go and live, it's considered inappropriate for men and women to show their bare legs in public.
Yet, our children are forced to see foreign visitor women parading around in Lycra tights that were considered intimate underwear just a generation ago. We are forced see their breasts, outlines of their genitals underneath.
How can we protect our children from such explicit content right on our public streets?
Fair point. I agree with the public sense. It is indeed unavoidable. Hence, on my previous threat here that it all comes down to the parents and the means.
Thread collapsed
People do the equivalent - return or move to rural areas, traditional lifestyles.
The same "tourists" come there and dare the local police to arrest them for wearing outfits and acting in ways that we consider what these visitors call "pornography", "harming minors", et cetera.
When we don't force our ways on them, they force their ways on us, even when we " go Amish".
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed